Open AccessResearch article

Arna L van Doorn – Klomberg1*, Jozé CC Braspenning1, René J Wolters1, Margriet Bouma2 and Michel Wensing1

Author Affiliations

1 Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands

2 Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG), Utrecht, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Family Practice 2014, 15:179  doi:10.1186/s12875-014-0179-4

Published: 4 November 2014

Abstract (provisional)

BackgroundPractice accreditation is widely used to assess and improve quality of healthcare providers. Little is known about its effectiveness, particularly in primary care. In this study we examined the effect of accreditation on quality of care regarding diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD).MethodsA comparative observational study with two cohorts was performed. We included 138 Dutch family practices that participated in the national accreditation program for primary care. A first cohort of 69 practices was measured at start and completion of a 3-year accreditation program. A second cohort of 69 practices was included and measured simultaneously with the final measurement of the first cohort. In separate multilevel regression analyses, we compared both within-group changes in the first cohort and between-groups differences at follow-up (first cohort) and start (second cohort). Outcome measures consisted of 24 systematically developed indicators of quality of care in targeted chronic diseases.ResultsIn the within-group comparison, we found improvements on 6 indicators related to diabetes (feet examination, cholesterol measurement, lipid lowering medication prescription) and COPD (spirometry performance, stop smoking advice). In the between-groups comparison we found that first cohort practices performed better on 4 indicators related to diabetes (cholesterol outcome) and CVD (blood pressure outcome, smoke status registration, glucose measurement).ConclusionsImprovements of the quality of primary care for patients with chronic diseases were found, but few could be attributed to the accreditation program. Further development of accreditation is needed to enhance its effectiveness on chronic disease management.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.