Tags

by: Jane Krause, Jan Van Lieshout, Rien Klomp, Elke Huntink, Eivind Aakhus, Signe Flottorp, Cornelia Jaeger, Jost Steinhaeuser, Maciek G. Cwirko, Anna Kowalczyk, Shona Agarwal, Michel Wensing, Richard Baker

RIS Export as RIS which can be imported into most citation managers
BibTeX Export as BibTeX which can be imported into most citation/bibliography managers
PDF Export formatted citations as PDF
RTF Export formatted citations as RTF which can be imported into most word processors
Delicious Export in format suitable for direct import into delicious.com. (Setup a permanent sync to delicious)
Formatted Text Export formatted citations as plain text

To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor, select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.

Formatted Citation

Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn’t been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article

Abstract

BackgroundThe tailoring of implementation interventions includes the identification of the determinants of, or barriers to, healthcare practice. Different methods for identifying determinants have been used in implementation projects, but which methods are most appropriate to use is unknown.MethodsThe study was undertaken in five European countries, recommendations for a different chronic condition being addressed in each country: Germany (polypharmacy in multimorbid patients); the Netherlands (cardiovascular risk management); Norway (depression in the elderly); Poland (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?COPD); and the United Kingdom (UK) (obesity). Using samples of professionals and patients in each country, three methods were compared directly: brainstorming amongst health professionals, interviews of health professionals, and interviews of patients. The additional value of discussion structured through reference to a checklist of determinants in addition to brainstorming, and determinants identified by open questions in a questionnaire survey, were investigated separately. The questionnaire, which included closed questions derived from a checklist of determinants, was administered to samples of health professionals in each country. Determinants were classified according to whether it was likely that they would inform the design of an implementation intervention (defined as plausibly important determinants).ResultsA total of 601 determinants judged to be plausibly important were identified. An additional 609 determinants were judged to be unlikely to inform an implementation intervention, and were classified as not plausibly important. Brainstorming identified 194 of the plausibly important determinants, health professional interviews 152, patient interviews 63, and open questions 48. Structured group discussion identified 144 plausibly important determinants in addition to those already identified by brainstorming.ConclusionsSystematic methods can lead to the identification of large numbers of determinants. Tailoring will usually include a process to decide, from all the determinants that are identified, those to be addressed by implementation interventions. There is no best buy of methods to identify determinants, and a combination should be used, depending on the topic and setting. Brainstorming is a simple, low cost method that could be relevant to many tailored implementation projects.

danielhind’s tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Export records

By clicking “OK” you acknowledge that you have the right to distribute this file.

CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.